Any of these would fix the issue for the card I have at hand, but I'm tempted to suggest the middle one (3.9e9).
Thanks! On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gustavo Niemeyer > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The newest images seem to present the same issue still. >> >> Any chance/intention of fixing this? > > yes please! > > Michael/Sergio: can you make a trello card so we don't forget for next > milestone? > > Gustavo/All: what buffer should we use to make this safe? > > (4-0.05)*10^9 bytes? > (4-0.10)*10^9 bytes? > (4-0.20)*10^9 bytes? > > Any preference or maybe ideas how to find the perfect number? I tend > to think unless we have good ideas, we should rather add more buffer > to be safe :). > >> >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 4GiB would actually be 300MiB *over* 4*10^9 bytes, so the image is already >>> discounting that. The device I have is ~3.98*10^9 bytes. >>> >>> On Feb 13, 2015 1:03 AM, "Gustavo Niemeyer" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> 4GiB would actually be 300MiB *over* 4*10^9 bytes, so the image is already >>>> discounting that. The device I have is ~3.98*10^9 bytes. >>>> >>>> On Feb 13, 2015 12:25 AM, "Joe Talbott" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:58:43PM -0200, Sergio Schvezov wrote: >>>>> > On jueves 12 de febrero de 2015 22h'25:51 BRST, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: >>>>> > >Hey all, >>>>> > > >>>>> > >It would be good to reduce the snappy image size just a little bit. >>>>> > >I have a Kingston MicroSD card that self-reports as 4GB, but it >>>>> > >is not large enough to hold the image. I had to take a few MB >>>>> > >out from the last partition to make it work. >>>>> > >>>>> > I totally agree! I just haven't figured out what a "bit" is; I guess >>>>> > I we can be on the safe side and say 4GB is going to 3.9GB (-100MB >>>>> > to be on the safe side given the plethora of devices). >>>>> > >>>>> > Is that a good number? >>>>> > >>>>> > Ogra, you gave me a long explanation on variation; is +/-100MB a >>>>> > good σ expected on the population of sdcards around? >>>>> >>>>> It's my understanding that a lot of storage manufacturers use 1000 as >>>>> the number of bits per kilobyte rather than 1024. I'd think -300MB would >>>>> suffice as that's roughly the difference between the two. >>>>> >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> snappy-devel mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel >> >> >> >> -- >> gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net >> >> -- >> snappy-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel -- gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net -- snappy-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
