But it doesnt have the same kind of effects as starving you or I to death would have.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Hopper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "The Sandbox Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:25 AM Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Right to Die > Maybe, but I'm with Laurie....it's still starving them to death. That's why > it's always bugged me... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'The Sandbox Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:05 AM > Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Right to Die > > > > Actually, the hospice folks here swear that removing the tube is actually > > more peaceful for the patient than other methods. Their body shuts down > and > > goes to sleep. > > > > > > Charles Mims > > http://www.the-sandbox.org > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of Laurie > > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:38 AM > > To: The Sandbox Discussion List > > Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Right to Die > > > > I have a problem with just stopping the feeding tube. > > That is starving her to death...nope...can't go with that..but if she is > > braindead, or in a permanent vegitative state, I can see increasing pain > > meds and ending her life that way....no suffering. In my opinion, > starvation > > is painful and suffering occurs. > > > > Laurie > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
