Pete, Could you inform us on the progress on the issue below?
Groet, (regards) ------------------------------------------ ing. Michiel Prins bsc [EMAIL PROTECTED] SOS Small Office Solutions / Reject / **** Wannepad 27 - 1066 HW - Amsterdam t.+31(0)20-4082627 - f.+31-(0)20-4082628 ------------------------------------------ Consultancy - Installation - Maintenance Network Security - Internet - E-mail Software Development - Project Management ------------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: woensdag 3 maart 2004 13:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sniffer] Resident Sniffer? At 03:54 AM 3/3/2004, you wrote: >Hi, > >Would it be possible to have a 'bogus' sniffer in memory at all time, >that provides other sniffer instances with the rulebase etc, the way it >is working now if you have concurrent sniffer sessions? > >It would be great to have one instance of sniffer 'out there' (not >scanning >messages) which is just waiting for others to share the DB with. This >speeds up message sniffing ror Mdaemon considerably, because MD can >only have 1 instance of the content filter at all times (and therefore >1 instance of Sniffer). That's very interesting... I didn't know that MDaemon was limited in this way. We are planning to make an update that will allow a sniffer instance to run in a script with long wait times so that it can be set up to do this. We are also planning to help integrate sniffer with MDaemon directly - I've been told we will begin working on that this month. Hope this helps, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html --- This message has been scanned for spam and viruses by www.reject.nl This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
