On Friday, July 16, 2004, 10:17:59 PM, Matt wrote:

<snip/>

M> Please note that I'm using WinZip 9.0's Command Line Option which is
M> free for registered users of WinZip.  I prefer this over gzip because I
M> use WinZip anyway and like the right click menu zipping that it provides
M> for, and the commands are quite simple and seemingly complete.  If you
M> move to support zip files, please don't discriminate against the 
M> non-open source stuff :)

That's a bit confusing.

(use Winzip, but don't discriminate against
open source (gzip?))

Anyway, I haven't had time to dive into that again. My
responsibilities have been expanding at an astonishing rate.
We will probably pursue this at some point, and when we do we will
probably accept log files gzipped with a .gz extension since they are
going to end up on a linux box for processing and I need a way to
identify them without going through a lot of hoops.

You'd be surprised how many times I've had to manually clear the
inbound directory of log files without a .log anywhere in the name -
It's not quite as easy as it might seem making all of this bullet
proof.

In the long term I hope to have Sniffer take care of it's own UL & DL
ops ... but that will be a while coming.

Thanks for the nudge.
I'll try and get it in edgewise.

Best,
_M




This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html

Reply via email to