On Tuesday, December 21, 2004, 1:13:15 PM, Matt wrote: M> Given that the precision is difficult to assign under the single result M> framework, I don't doubt the choice. Might I suggest creating a M> sub-group for the three main types of backscatter so that individuals M> can turn them off as a group instead of one rule at a time. Note that M> the three groups that I have defined personally are as follows:
M> - Joe-Job NDR's. M> - Challenge/Response Idiots M> - AntiVirus Notifications I'm thinking in this direction - but I'm not sure yet what our coding rules will allow since there tends to be a lot of overlap. I don't think we'll be creating C/R related rules, at least not yet. That's a category where zealots are everywhere and we have learned to avoid filtering anything that even looks like part of a C/R system unless specifically asked to do so. If we get a lot of call for it then I _might_ create a project to code those rules as an optional add-in on request. For now we're going to stick to the safe stuff that can be applied broadly. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
