News item?
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Pete McNeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:34:57 -0500 >Hello Sniffer Folks, > > I have been doing some work in the database today to make the rule > strength analysis and weak rule removal process more efficient. > Along the way I discovered an appreciable number of rules that had > somehow been left with high strength numbers even though their > recent activity values were zero. I have corrected this code. > > I expect that this will reduce the size of the rulebase files, > though I am not yet certain how big the change will be. I am hopeful > that the change will be large enough to yield a performance > increase. > > There should be only positive impacts from the changes that I have > made, but just in case I will be watching things very closely. > > Please let me know right away if you sense any drastic changes other > than, perhaps, the size of the rulebase files. > > I've made arrangements to put everything back the way it was if need > be ;-) > >Thanks, >_M > >Pete McNeil (Madscientist) >President, MicroNeil Research Corporation >Chief SortMonster (www.sortmonster.com) > > > >This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html > __________________________________________________________ Systems Support and Hosting Services by MicroNeil Research This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
