On Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 9:13:19 PM, Karen wrote:
KP> News item? No thanks. _M KP> ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- KP> From: Pete McNeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KP> Reply-To: [email protected] KP> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:34:57 -0500 >>Hello Sniffer Folks, >> >> I have been doing some work in the database today to make the KP> rule >> strength analysis and weak rule removal process more efficient. >> Along the way I discovered an appreciable number of rules that KP> had >> somehow been left with high strength numbers even though their >> recent activity values were zero. I have corrected this code. >> >> I expect that this will reduce the size of the rulebase files, >> though I am not yet certain how big the change will be. I am KP> hopeful >> that the change will be large enough to yield a performance >> increase. >> >> There should be only positive impacts from the changes that I KP> have >> made, but just in case I will be watching things very closely. >> >> Please let me know right away if you sense any drastic changes KP> other >> than, perhaps, the size of the rulebase files. >> >> I've made arrangements to put everything back the way it was if KP> need >> be ;-) >> >>Thanks, >>_M >> >>Pete McNeil (Madscientist) >>President, MicroNeil Research Corporation >>Chief SortMonster (www.sortmonster.com) >> >> >> >>This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For KP> information and (un)subscription instructions go to KP> http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html >> KP> __________________________________________________________ KP> Systems Support and Hosting Services by MicroNeil Research KP> This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For KP> information and (un)subscription instructions go to KP> http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
