_M i'll try this one, Jim, you will keep all of your Content Filter rules the same 'except' you will disable (or delete) the two Sniffer entries 'Run Message Sniffer' & Add Headers'. Those two functions will be generated from the plug-in.
Also, if you are using the results codes (in the Content Filter) you will need to change any instance of "X-SPAM-Msg-Sniffer-Result" TO "X-SortMonster-MessageSniffer-Result" as indicated in the readme.txt file. Paul R -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Matuska Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 5:01 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: (DUMP)Re: Re[4]: [sniffer] Message Sniffer Plugin for MDaemon Wide Beta & Promo I meant do I configure actions based on the headers that sniffer returns like in the non plug in version, or does the plugin do this automatically, the documentation for the plug in is kind of vague in comparison to the older version. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jim Matuska" <sniffer@SortMonster.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 1:51 PM Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer] Message Sniffer Plugin for MDaemon Wide Beta & Promo > On Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 4:19:48 PM, Jim wrote: > > JM> Do you configure rules similar to in the previous versions, or by > using this > JM> as a plug in is there a GUI for configuration. > > We configure the rulebase the same way we have in the past. Using the > plugin is not different from using the command line utility except > that the performance is better (faster) and the installation and > operation is simpler. The "service/subscription" part of Message > Sniffer has not changed. > > --- > > We have a GUI web app for the rulebase (we use it every day), however > we have discovered through trial and error that a lot of specialized > training is required to keep the rulebase working correctly and that > one GUI does not suit many users... each group seems to need their > own! > > We are working on plans for some simpler web apps in the future to > handle specialized tasks, however that too seems best handled in other > ways for the time being. For example, every system that provides > automation to their users for false positive handling and custom > black-rules seems to do it in their own special way --- so rather than > build a web app that doesn't really suit anyone we have adopted the > strategy of providing automation tools (such as our XML based REmost > SCripted Updater [RESCU] utility) and consulting to integrate each > customer's existing or planned automation efforts with their back-end > rulebase configuration. These efforts are usually reserved for larger > systems such as small ISPs and filtering service providers. > > As always we want to support any third party efforts to provide > automation tools also. So far we haven't seen much in the way of GUI > automation, probably for the same reasons we haven't tackled it yet. > > I think I may have answered more than the base question here - but I'm > hoping I've addressed some of the underlying questions. > > _M > > > > > This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information > and (un)subscription instructions go to > http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html > This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
