On Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 8:14:53 PM, David wrote: DS> Hello Pete,
DS> Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 8:11:50 PM, you wrote: DS>>> Not sure, can anyone think of a way to cross check this? What if I put DS>>> all the released messages back through sniffer? PM>> That would be good -- new rules were added to correctly capture the PM>> bad stuff. I almost suggested something more complex. DS> That said...anyone know specifics of reprocessing messages through DS> Declude on Imail? I know that in 1.x Declude would drop some kind of DS> marker so that q/d's copied into spool would not be reprocessed but I DS> don't remember what it was and don't know if it works same in 3.x. DS> Posted question on Declude JM list but no answer so far. IIRC messages in the spool under scan would be locked until declude was done with them. After that, placing the Q and D files into the spool would mean that normal IMail processes would deliver them on the next sweep. The way around this was to place the messages back in the overflow folder (I'm not sure which parts - I think the Q goes in overflow and the D stays in spool -- someone will know for sure). The theory there is that messages sent to the overflow folder are sent there before they are scanned in order to backlog the extra processing load. So, messages coming out of the overflow folder would naturally be scanned ( for the first time - thinks the robot ). _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
