Pete,
The overflow directory disappeared when 3.x was introduced. I posted a
follow up on the Declude list about how to do this.
Matt
Pete McNeil wrote:
On Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 8:14:53 PM, David wrote:
DS> Hello Pete,
DS> Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 8:11:50 PM, you wrote:
DS>>> Not sure, can anyone think of a way to cross check this? What if I put
DS>>> all the released messages back through sniffer?
PM>> That would be good -- new rules were added to correctly capture the
PM>> bad stuff. I almost suggested something more complex.
DS> That said...anyone know specifics of reprocessing messages through
DS> Declude on Imail? I know that in 1.x Declude would drop some kind of
DS> marker so that q/d's copied into spool would not be reprocessed but I
DS> don't remember what it was and don't know if it works same in 3.x.
DS> Posted question on Declude JM list but no answer so far.
IIRC messages in the spool under scan would be locked until declude
was done with them. After that, placing the Q and D files into the
spool would mean that normal IMail processes would deliver them on the
next sweep.
The way around this was to place the messages back in the overflow
folder (I'm not sure which parts - I think the Q goes in overflow and
the D stays in spool -- someone will know for sure).
The theory there is that messages sent to the overflow folder are sent
there before they are scanned in order to backlog the extra processing
load. So, messages coming out of the overflow folder would naturally
be scanned ( for the first time - thinks the robot ).
_M
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
