We just use a single test, we don't categorise. If SNIFFER returns a result
we weight it. However, SNIFFER oftens returns a zero result when the email
is obviously junk i.e. SNIFFER returns a positive result (spam) in about 30%
of all identified junk mail.

SNIFFER external nonzero "\declude\sniffer\sniffer.exe" 23  0


-----Original Message-----
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Markus Gufler
Sent: 06 June 2006 11:17
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer]AW: [sniffer]AW: [sniffer]Concerned about amount of spam
going through

Hi

There mus be something wrong with your configuration of the sniffer test(s)

Here are my numbers from yesterday based on 24462 processed messages

Date    Test                            SS      SH      HH      HS      IMP
0605    SNIFFER-TRAVEL          12      0       0       23      2
0605    SNIFFER-INSUR           4       0       0       0       0
0605    SNIFFER-AV                      0       0       0       0       0
0605    SNIFFER-MEDIA           1345    0       0       0       8
0605    SNIFFER-SWARE           73      0       0       0       0
0605    SNIFFER-SNAKE           8386    0       0       0       9
0605    SNIFFER-SCAMS           138     0       0       2       3
0605    SNIFFER-PORN            908     0       0       1       3
0605    SNIFFER-MALWARE         12      0       0       2       3
0605    SNIFFER-INK                     2       0       0       0       0
0605    SNIFFER-RICH            2865    0       0       2       219
0605    SNIFFER-CREDIT          363     0       0       0       1
0605    SNIFFER-CASINO          300     0       0       0       0
0605    SNIFFER-GENERAL         2881    0       0       41      41
0605    SNIFFER-EXP-A           450     0       0       36      7
0605    SNIFFER-OBFUSC          4       0       0       5       0
0605    SNIFFER-EXP-IP          28      0       0       8       5


SS      Sniffer says spam, final result too
SH      Sniffer says spam, final result not
HH      Sniffer says ham, final result too
HS      Sniffer says ham, final result not

IMP     Sniffer says spam and final result is slight above the hold weight.
        (This column is a part of the SS-column: 100-150% of hold)
        So
        a.) it's an important test because it's able to bring the spam above
the hold 
            weight and without this test it wasn't hold as spam.
        or
        b.) it's a risky test because it brings legit messages above the
hold weight

What result codes are you using in your test configuration? (please not
publish your sniffer-id!)

Markus




> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Message Sniffer Community
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von David Waller
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Juni 2006 11:51
> An: Message Sniffer Community
> Betreff: Re: [sniffer]AW: [sniffer]Concerned about amount of spam 
> going through
> 
> Of all SPAM identified SNIFFER is finding about 30%. We see an awful 
> lot of junk email not being caught by SNIFFER, it's being processed by 
> Declude and failing some technical tests but not by SNIFFER.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Message Sniffer Community
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
> Sent: 06 June 2006 09:41
> To: Message Sniffer Community
> Subject: [sniffer]AW: [sniffer]Concerned about amount of spam going 
> through
> 
> > I only see Sniffer catching about 30% of SPAM and that's
> the highest
> > it's ever been.
> 
> 30% of spam or 30% of all processed messages?
> Sniffer is still one of the best tests in my arsenal.
> 
> Markus
> 
> 
> 
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>   the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to 
> the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch 
> to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send 
> administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>   the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To 
> switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, 
> E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative 
> queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 



#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to