That's good news, Bill.

Can I be the first to point out that in your example, you're still
calling ShowMe.exe and not WeightGate.exe so you will be appending to
c:\ShowMe.log with every call?

And for those new to the party, I'll explain that what Bill is doing
with his modified configuration is to avoid calling InvURIBL when the
current Declude weight is less than -50 or more than 10.

If it's less than -50, Bill is presumably already heavily negatively
weighting known ham senders and thus avoiding calling InvURIBL on
messages that are ham.

Likewise, it the current weight is more than 10, Bill is assuming the
message is already spammy enough and doesn't want InvURIBL to run on
those either.

Andrew 8)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Message Sniffer Community 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn Systems
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:11 PM
> To: Message Sniffer Community
> Subject: [sniffer] Re: Weight Gate Success? Failure?
> 
> 
> I've tried Pete's WeightGate with INVURIBL.
> 
> Original line in Declude Global Config.
>  INV-URIBL external weight "E:\INVURIBL\invURIBL.exe %WEIGHT% 
> %REMOTEIP%" 5  > 0
> 
> New line
>  INVARIANT external weight "e:\tools\ShowMe.exe -50 %WEIGHT% 
> 10 E:\INVURIBL\invURIBL.exe %WEIGHT% %REMOTEIP%" 5 0
> 
> Account for line Wrap
> 
> I have verified Invuribl is being called. I'm still 
> confirming Spam Blocking Performance. The resulting CPU 
> savings were no less than stunning.
> 
> Bill Green
> dfn Systems
> 
> 
> > INV-URIBL external weight "E:\INVURIBL\invURIBL.exe %WEIGHT% 
> > %REMOTEIP%" 5  > 0
> 
> > INVARIANT external weight "e:\tool\ShowMe.exe -50 %WEIGHT% 10 
> > E:\INVURIBL\invURIBL.exe %WEIGHT% %REMOTEIP%" 5 0
> 
> Account for line Wrap
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Message Sniffer Community" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:48 AM
> Subject: [sniffer] Weight Gate Success? Failure?
> 
> 
> > Hello Sniffer Folks,
> >
> >  Is anyone successfully using the WeightGate utility?
> >
> >  Anyone having trouble with it?
> >
> >  I've literally heard nothing so far ;-)
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> >  _M
> >
> > -- 
> > Pete McNeil
> > Chief Scientist,
> > Arm Research Labs, LLC.
> >
> >
> > #############################################################
> > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
> >  the mailing list <[email protected]>.
> > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
> 
> 
> 
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>   the mailing list <[email protected]>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 


#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to