That's where the rule was, I believe. It started over the weekend, and Pete removed the rule morning or mid-day yesterday.
Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Evanitsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Message Sniffer Community" <sniffer@sortmonster.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:35 AM Subject: [sniffer] Re: Significant increase in false positives On Oct 16, 2006, at 5:17 PM, Darin Cox wrote: > Anyone else seeing a sudden increase in FPs? We normally report a > few each day, but we're seeing a 10x increase in FPs for the past > three days. What particular group, if any, are you seeing them in? The experimental-abstract (61) category is my main fp problem lately. Curious, Greg ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
