On 3/12/2012 5:41 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Started getting hits at 4:30pm EST up to 15 minutes ago (5:25pm EST). Not sure if the rule has been pulled or corrected yet.It was corrected nearly as soon as it was created. It did escape into some rulebases - we saw that on our conflict instrument. Most systems auto-panicked the rule right away. It no longer appears on our conflict instruments - so there is no reason you should see any hits from it. I'm chasing things down to see what I can see -- based on your message. Best, _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist ARM Research Labs, LLC www.armresearch.com 866-770-1044 x7010 twitter/codedweller ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[email protected]>. This list is for discussing Message Sniffer, Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics. For More information see http://www.armresearch.com To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> Send administrative queries to <[email protected]> |
- [sniffer] Re: FPs on Sniffer-Schemes Darin Cox
- [sniffer] Re: FPs on Sniffer-Scheme... Pete McNeil
- [sniffer] Re: FPs on Sniffer-Scheme... Colbeck, Andrew
- [sniffer] Re: FPs on Sniffer-Scheme... Pete McNeil
- [sniffer] Re: FPs on Sniffer-Scheme... Pete McNeil
- [sniffer] Re: FPs on Sniffer-Scheme... Darin Cox
- [sniffer] Re: FPs on Sniffer-Scheme... Scott Fosseen [Prairie Lakes AEA]
- [sniffer] Re: FPs on Sniffer-Scheme... Pete McNeil
