Hi Julien,
MINA seems to be easy to use, indeed.
I have planned a nio implementation of
the UDP transport mapping for SNMP4J 2.0
(Java SE 5 based).
The slf4j is not an option, because
(a) SNMP4J should not have any dependency
to a third party lib.
(b) slf4j does not implement all necessary
functions needed by SNMP4J-Agent.
I may put a link on the SNMP4J site to
your transport mapping implementation, when
you think it is ready for production usage.
Best regards,
Frank
Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
I'm a commiter on Apache MINA and a great fan of SNMP4J (I use it since
few year). So naturally I made a mina based transport for snmp4j.
Anyway if you look at the code the use of MINA, managed to reduce the
number of LoC, removing all the listener/worker thread code, because
it's using MINA executor filter for processing incoming data.
The first quick implementations here :
http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/snmp4j/
Basic testing showed it's working. I hope some of you will be
interested ;)
I know it's here because snmp4j is a bit old now, but I think the whole
logging class could be removed to use a logging facade library like
slf4j so the user can choose wich logging framework to use without need
to know about org.snmp4j.log.* classes. Oh, and using sl4j remove the
need to test isDebugEnabled() because it's doing the string
concatenation only if needed. If you want I can provide some patch for
that.
Julien
P.S. : cross-posting to mina-dev list, because I know there is some
snmp4j users there.
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
--
AGENT++
http://www.agentpp.com
http://www.mibexplorer.com
http://www.mibdesigner.com
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
