Interesting. Why does the agent code need to do that?
Regards,
Alan
On May 27, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Frank Fock wrote:
Hi Julien,
AFAIK, you cannot discover the registered loggers
from slf4j.
Regards,
Frank
Julien Vermillard wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Frank
I'll say when it's production ready, I'll probably test it next week
with a bigger network than my first test.
About SLF4J, I know SNMP4J plan for no dependencies, but, simple
curiosity, what are exactly the missing feature of slf4j ??
Julien
On Mon, 26 May 2008 23:33:46 +0200
Frank Fock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Julien,
MINA seems to be easy to use, indeed.
I have planned a nio implementation of
the UDP transport mapping for SNMP4J 2.0
(Java SE 5 based).
The slf4j is not an option, because
(a) SNMP4J should not have any dependency
to a third party lib.
(b) slf4j does not implement all necessary
functions needed by SNMP4J-Agent.
I may put a link on the SNMP4J site to
your transport mapping implementation, when
you think it is ready for production usage.
Best regards,
Frank
Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
I'm a commiter on Apache MINA and a great fan of SNMP4J (I use it
since few year). So naturally I made a mina based transport for
snmp4j.
Anyway if you look at the code the use of MINA, managed to reduce
the number of LoC, removing all the listener/worker thread code,
because it's using MINA executor filter for processing incoming
data.
The first quick implementations here :
http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/snmp4j/
Basic testing showed it's working. I hope some of you will be
interested ;)
I know it's here because snmp4j is a bit old now, but I think the
whole logging class could be removed to use a logging facade
library like slf4j so the user can choose wich logging framework to
use without need to know about org.snmp4j.log.* classes. Oh, and
using sl4j remove the need to test isDebugEnabled() because it's
doing the string concatenation only if needed. If you want I can
provide some patch for that.
Julien
P.S. : cross-posting to mina-dev list, because I know there is some
snmp4j users there.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIO9VsHMBmbW1IlcURAiCRAJ4kpSee2IkwUiygbZh62lm4YFqfEwCeMuWc
K/xPInF7q9CJxEZChpmiis8=
=xqNh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
--
AGENT++
http://www.agentpp.com
http://www.mibexplorer.com
http://www.mibdesigner.com
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
