Yes, the properties used are based on Sun's, but additional properties are used. The properties are generally read in HTTPUtils.java. The ones I see are
http.proxyHost http.nonProxyHosts http.proxyPort http.proxyUser http.proxyPassword https.proxyHost https.nonProxyHosts https.proxyPort https.proxyAuth Some changes I would like to make are to have https.proxyUser https.proxyPassword as an alternative to https.proxyAuth, and also user/password for the service (in addition to the proxy). Scott Nichol Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address, because it is filtered to accept only mail from specific mail lists. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tudor, Liviu @Cimage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 11:24 AM Subject: RE: Read HTTP[S] proxy information from system properties if not explicitly specified Malte, here's the info you're probably looking for: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.html Liviu Liviu Tudor Cimage Novasoft Limited www.cimagenovasoft.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1344 767701 Direct Line: +44 (0)1344 767759 Centennial Court, Easthampstead Road, Bracknell, BERKS, RG12 1JZ Real programmers don't comment their code. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand. -----Original Message----- From: Malte Kempff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Read HTTP[S] proxy information from system properties if not explicitly specified Hi Scott, I also have read the List with the features can you tell me what the system properties names are to set for a proxy, or where I can find them? is user-name and pasword included in those properties, or are those ones to secure? thanks a lot in advance, Malte -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Februar 2004 16:40 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the HTTPUtils.post method http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ws-soap/java/docs/changes.html Scott Nichol Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address, because it is filtered to accept only mail from specific mail lists. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tudor, Liviu @Cimage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:22 AM Subject: RE: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the HTTPUtils.post method Scott, sorry to be lazy -- have you got a link to the list of improvements for this version? Thanks! Liviu Liviu Tudor Cimage Novasoft Limited www.cimagenovasoft.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1344 767701 Direct Line: +44 (0)1344 767759 Centennial Court, Easthampstead Road, Bracknell, BERKS, RG12 1JZ Real programmers don't comment their code. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the HTTPUtils.post method Yes, the current code base is more efficient and does cut out one of the in-memory copies of the payload, so large payloads are processed more efficiently. There are other speed improvements as well. As you have pointed out elsewhere, however, anyone who wants a binary can only get one from September 2003. Fortunately, this includes the performance improvements. Scott Nichol Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address, because it is filtered to accept only mail from specific mail lists. ----- Original Message ----- From: "WJCarpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 6:02 PM Subject: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the HTTPUtils.post method sn> Handling large SOAP payloads is something Apache SOAP is known to sn> do slowly, but there is no major improvement planned. Several Didn't one of the post-2.3.1 patches eliminate one of the in-memory copies of the entire response payload (or am I just imagining that)? If so, using the latest nightly CVS snapshot would at least give a minor piece of relief on that score. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (WJCarpenter) PGP 0x91865119 38 95 1B 69 C9 C6 3D 25 73 46 32 04 69 D6 ED F3
