The changes.html file is normally maintained in chronological order, so I believe that "Support gzip encoding for HTTP" was added to Apache SOAP before "Read HTTP[S] proxy information from system properties if not explicitly specified."
Scott Nichol Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address, because it is filtered to accept only mail from specific mail lists. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Malte Kempff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 7:07 AM Subject: AW: Read HTTP[S] proxy information from system properties if not explicitly specified Hi Scott, first of all, thanks a lot of your answer. in the list of the featuers of the latest SOAP, did the change with the gzip-support accur before or after the change with the supported system-properties in your answer mail below? the reason I need to know that is because I might have to download the latest version of SOAP. Malte -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Februar 2004 18:22 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Read HTTP[S] proxy information from system properties if not explicitly specified Yes, the properties used are based on Sun's, but additional properties are used. The properties are generally read in HTTPUtils.java. The ones I see are http.proxyHost http.nonProxyHosts http.proxyPort http.proxyUser http.proxyPassword https.proxyHost https.nonProxyHosts https.proxyPort https.proxyAuth Some changes I would like to make are to have https.proxyUser https.proxyPassword as an alternative to https.proxyAuth, and also user/password for the service (in addition to the proxy). Scott Nichol Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address, because it is filtered to accept only mail from specific mail lists. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tudor, Liviu @Cimage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 11:24 AM Subject: RE: Read HTTP[S] proxy information from system properties if not explicitly specified Malte, here's the info you're probably looking for: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.html Liviu Liviu Tudor Cimage Novasoft Limited www.cimagenovasoft.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1344 767701 Direct Line: +44 (0)1344 767759 Centennial Court, Easthampstead Road, Bracknell, BERKS, RG12 1JZ Real programmers don't comment their code. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand. -----Original Message----- From: Malte Kempff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Read HTTP[S] proxy information from system properties if not explicitly specified Hi Scott, I also have read the List with the features can you tell me what the system properties names are to set for a proxy, or where I can find them? is user-name and pasword included in those properties, or are those ones to secure? thanks a lot in advance, Malte -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Februar 2004 16:40 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the HTTPUtils.post method http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ws-soap/java/docs/changes.html Scott Nichol Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address, because it is filtered to accept only mail from specific mail lists. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tudor, Liviu @Cimage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:22 AM Subject: RE: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the HTTPUtils.post method Scott, sorry to be lazy -- have you got a link to the list of improvements for this version? Thanks! Liviu Liviu Tudor Cimage Novasoft Limited www.cimagenovasoft.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1344 767701 Direct Line: +44 (0)1344 767759 Centennial Court, Easthampstead Road, Bracknell, BERKS, RG12 1JZ Real programmers don't comment their code. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the HTTPUtils.post method Yes, the current code base is more efficient and does cut out one of the in-memory copies of the payload, so large payloads are processed more efficiently. There are other speed improvements as well. As you have pointed out elsewhere, however, anyone who wants a binary can only get one from September 2003. Fortunately, this includes the performance improvements. Scott Nichol Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address, because it is filtered to accept only mail from specific mail lists. ----- Original Message ----- From: "WJCarpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 6:02 PM Subject: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the HTTPUtils.post method sn> Handling large SOAP payloads is something Apache SOAP is known to sn> do slowly, but there is no major improvement planned. Several Didn't one of the post-2.3.1 patches eliminate one of the in-memory copies of the entire response payload (or am I just imagining that)? If so, using the latest nightly CVS snapshot would at least give a minor piece of relief on that score. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (WJCarpenter) PGP 0x91865119 38 95 1B 69 C9 C6 3D 25 73 46 32 04 69 D6 ED F3
