On 23 January 2011 09:31, Dieter Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Brad Allen wrote at 2011-1-21 08:29 -0600: >> ... >>> I realise this is probably just because of the history of the project, >>> but it would be a lot less confusing if someone could just tag a 1.0 >>> final release or something so that someone who wants stable and >>> working code (even if it's not guaranteed to be bug free) knows what >>> to use. >> >>That's a good suggestion; are there any naysayers? > > Nothing is guaranted to be bug free. But known problems should > be documented. And if some of these were grave, no final release > should be published.
Except that, as mentioned by Burak, 0.8.2 and 1.0.0 were actually released. Just from the arskom/rpclib repository. So it's too late not to publish them now. > Not publishing a final release indicates "this version has > been abondoned and probably should not be used". > Thus, we should publish a final release when the indication is not true. -- Michael Wood <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Soap mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/soap
