In a message dated 04/28/2008 12:02:17 AM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

It's been pointed out to me that my post in reply to a message from Bill 
Wingstedt could be read as actually meaning to call him an idiot. I 
believe a close reading will reveal that I was agreeing with his brass 
tube/carbon rod trick and complimented him by asking him to make a 
couple of them for me. However, I can see how it might not look like 
that. So I want to make clear that I have no negative opinions about 
Bill, haven't met him, and agree with his post. Ok, maybe I have the 
negative opinion that he shouldn't call himself an idiot.

This isn't the only time where I've been called on something like this, 
so I thought I'd better make sure that there were no hard feelings where 
such were not meant.

(The other time I remember was on a bicycling list where people had a 
discussion about whether some kinds of plastic water bottles were toxic. 
I asserted that only organic goat skins were safe for water, and that 
vegans were out of luck. Someone I knew actually had a hard time 
deciding if I was serious. I wasn't.)

-Lincoln
ravaging engineer who has lost his horde

No problems here Lincoln. I read between the lines and got it. I have 
probably ticked off a few people with my obfuscated meanings and alternate 
interpretations. But it's nice to know somebody has risen to my defense, unless 
maybe 
they were congratulating you for calling me an idiot so they wouldn't have to. 
:P
And even at that, I've deprived them of the satisfaction fo telling me 
something I don't already know.
 
Bill Wingstedt
 



**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car 
listings at AOL Autos.      
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)

Reply via email to