The OEM's never anticipated the idea of running more than one RX, hence I'm sure do not see the need, nor the expense of considering such a case. Cost-wise it would be more money.
regards
Chuck Anderson wrote:
At 05:19 PM 3/25/2005, you wrote:
The problem on dual RX setups is not the antennas, but co-interference between the IF's within each of the RX's. This is what reduces sensitivity. This problem is solved easily by shielding one or both RX's.
The shielding can be as simple as a 6" x 6" conductive plate that is strategically place between the two RX's, or could mean literally wrapping one RX with a highly conductive shielding material (eg: permeable copper).
Why not just put the receiver in a metal case as was done with the Proline receivers I used for so many years. I have not been impressed with the packaging of most modern receivers anyway. An extra ounce in the nose of my sailplane just means that I can take more lead out of the nose.
Chuck Anderson
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
-- Simon Van Leeuwen RADIUS SYSTEMS PnP SYSTEMS - The E-Harness of Choice Cogito Ergo Zooom
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
