"Sugar on a Stick" is not trademarked; my position is that it should be, and the sooner the better.
I'm all for changing our strategy, marketing and PR, but there needs to be compelling marketing reasons for doing so. I haven't heard any yet. Like throwing out code, doing so has a cost. Sean On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Martin Dengler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:24:34AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: >> Karen is SFC lawyer with whom I have been discussing trademark issues. >> Rather than everyone on the list bombarding her with questions, could >> we please come up with a composite list that we can present to her? > > Some possible questions: > > 1) Is "Sugar on a Stick" a trademark of Sugar Labs ([1] section 5.a > suggests it is not)? > > 2) What is the "Sugar Labs software" mentioned in [1] section 2.a)? > > 3) Would another (non-SFC, non-Sugar Labs) organisation trademarking a > name like "Sugar on a Stick Chocolate" (and refusing to desist from > this trademark action) result in legal action by SFC/Sugar Labs? > >> thanks, >> >> -walter > > Martin > > 1. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark > > > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas > > _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
