On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:24:13PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote: > We've been a distro distributor for months - from the before the > beta-1 Sugar on a Stick announcement.
Who's we? sugaronastick.com? Sugar Labs members? Let's be clear: Sugar Labs does not have the staff to compete with Canonical or Fedora as a distro vendor. So please help me understand to what "distro distributor" tasks you think the DP should propose to SLOB. > And, we are marketing it with success (cf. worldwide tech press > coverage, the BBC, etc). How many people are using it? Satisfied with SoaS as a distro? What's the target deployment size, and what SL support will be required? I'm not saying it can't be done. I'm saying I don't see any agreement on what it is or who's going to do it. Without that we should... > We can do this because we are very, very careful not to overpromise. ...not overpromise :). > Part of our work is to jumpstart a support ecosystem. To the extent this impacts SoaS, this sounds like wishful thinking. Who's doing this? With what plan? What targets are there? Why do we believe they'll be met? > It's certainly not easy, but it's not impossible, in my view. "Not impossible" covers a lot of ground. What happened to not overpromising :). > Sean. Martin
pgp3F83FINKMK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
