Wade Brainerd wrote: [...] snip!
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Martin Dengler > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > 1) is SoaS a separate distro to Fedora > > No - it changes less than 0.1% of Fedora so I cannot call it a separate > distro. It's not as easy as that. Currently, SoaS *is* a separate distro. It doesn't affiliate itself anyhow with Fedora branding-wise. It uses Fedora as a base system, but it doesn't get promoted as the "Fedora Sugar Spin". However, this could change *if* the way to go was to have a ton of different distributions competing for the brand's name. The point some people have been making is that the underlying distribution is *entirely* different. I've supported that, stating that SoaS was much more than just a Fedora Remix. But I'm not sure whether that's feasible, depending on the outcome of this discussion. > 2) should SL distribute a distro of its own > > Irrelevant per 1 I guess that would bring Sean up... > 3) can SL do this (#2) additional work > > Irrelevant per 1 I feel so irrelevant... heh, just kidding. :) > Best, > Wade --Sebastian _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
