Hi Martin, I'm sure there must be some way we can get on the same page. Perhaps we're approaching the same data points but with different opinions of how well SoaS is working out.
>From my perspective, SoaS suits my needs very well. From what I read on the mailing lists, it seems to be making good progress towards the goal of being suitable for classroom use; if not on XOs, at least on PCs... And in any case, it should be the same as or better than Fedora in terms of how well it runs. You seem to be suggesting that it's doomed unless we massively expand the scope of our development efforts. I think all of these questions and hypothetical situations ultimately stem from these two vantage points. On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Martin Dengler <[email protected]>wrote: > 1) is SoaS a separate distro to Fedora > No - it changes less than 0.1% of Fedora so I cannot call it a separate distro. > 2) should SL distribute a distro of its own > Irrelevant per 1 3) can SL do this (#2) additional work > Irrelevant per 1 Best, Wade
_______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
