My answers: Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" 1. no - don't want to force people to use one distribution as this could create a barrier to entry
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?" 2. yes - neutral about what distribution you base Sugar on so as not to create barriers to entry for anyone Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?" 3. yes - need to have no confusion on what a user has when they say they are using Sugar on a Stick, use other names for other products 2009/10/6 Martin Dengler <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 10:47:17AM +1300, Tabitha Roder wrote: >> Do you think we could make a summary of the discussion about >> "Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar >> Labs, and related questions" and put it on >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Decision_panels/SOAS ? >> >> It might be useful in seeing whether our discussions are getting any >> closer to clarifying any of the issues and our position on them. That >> might make future discussion more targeted. > > I wanted to explicitly say thanks for encouraging this. I've made a > start here: > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Decision_panels/SOAS#Executive_Summary , > but it's very sparse because I'd rather the main proponents of the > "consensus" answers do so. Right now I'm down as the exact opposite > of each "consensus" answer :). > >> Tabitha > > Martin > _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
