On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Tabitha Roder <[email protected]> wrote: > My answers: > Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than > just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" > 1. no - don't want to force people to use one distribution as this > could create a barrier to entry > > Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing > Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?" > 2. yes - neutral about what distribution you base Sugar on so as not > to create barriers to entry for anyone
I see two variants to this question that we might want to ask separately: 2+ : "Should SL be neutral about all distros containing Sugar, regardless of how integral Sugar is to the distro and its intended uses?" 2.1: "Should SL be available to provide outreach, publicity campaigns, mentoring and other support for distributions [containing | centered around] Sugar?" You could answer 'yes' to 2 but 'no' to 2+ (though perhaps not vice-versa)... and 2.1 is pretty independent of 2. _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
