Portable Sugar? carlo
--- Mer 4/11/09, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Da: Samuel Klein <[email protected]> > Oggetto: Re: [Marketing] [SoaS] updating the draft decision panel report > A: "Sean DALY" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], "Sugar Labs Marketing" > <[email protected]>, "Caryl Bigenho" <[email protected]>, > "Mailing lists" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Data: Mercoledì 4 novembre 2009, 00:47 > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Sean DALY <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The marketing list has again disappeared, I have added it > back, again. > > > Weird, thanks. > > This seems reasonable, but all it would do is compromise > Sugar on a > > Stick as a meaningful name. > Any other suggestion for a generic name for the class of > external-media distributions would be fine. Sebastian > likes "Sugar Live Media" which works for me. > > > The most generic term for what Sugar on a > Stick is "a liveUSB version > > > of Sugar". > > This seems somewhat confusing to me, since as a newbie I > wouldn't know what 'liveUSB' means and I might > be using an SD card. > > SJ > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Caryl Bigenho <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi... > > > > > > It's sort of like root beer... > > > > > > You can buy A&W or Barq's or other private > labels... or make your own. It is > > > still "root beer." > > > > > > Sugar on a Stick is really exactly what it says, Sugar > running on a usb > > > stick. It is a very descriptive label. To call other > distributions of Sugar > > > on a usb stick something else would be confusing. > However, calling it say, > > > "Blueberry Sugar on a Stick by Sugar Labs" > or "Orange Sugar on a Stick by > > > Skunk Works" would distinguish the developer and > variety without being > > > confusing and still tell folks what it is. > > > > > > Then they could tell one another... "get the > Blueberry by SugarLabs, it's > > > much better than Skunk Works' Orange." > > > > > > Remember your, generally, technologically innocent > (not all of them) > > > intended end user. > > > > > > Caryl > > > > > > > > > > > >> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:31:33 +0000 > > >> From: [email protected] > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> CC: [email protected]; > [email protected]; > > >> [email protected] > > >> Subject: Re: [SoaS] updating the draft decision > panel report > > >> > > >> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 11:08:22PM -0800, Caryl > Bigenho wrote: > > >> > > >> I'm having trouble squaring this with your > earlier > > >> statement[1]. Aren't you saying both: > > >> > > >> > > [let's allow lots of "Sugar On > A Stick" products] > > >> > > >> and[2]: > > >> > > >> > [too many names are confusing] > > >> > > >> Please can you explain how to reconcile both [1] > and [2]. > > >> > > >> > Caryl > > >> > > >> Martin > > >> > > >> 1. > > >> > > Hi... I guess I've become the > minority. I still believe that the > > >> > > name "Sugar On A Stick" should > be allowed for all distributions of > > >> > > Sugar on a usb stick or even a live CD. > Sugar Labs can control > > >> > > and identify their special builds in a > special way... "SoaS by > > >> > > SugarLabs" or whatever, but the > term has already become so generic > > >> > > that trying to make it exclusive at this > point seems to be a waste > > >> > > of time and energy. > > >> > > >> 2. > > >> > Having many different names for different > versions of Sugar on a usb > > >> > stick will only confuse them. > > >> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > SoaS mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SoaS mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas > > > > > -----Segue allegato----- > > _______________________________________________ > Marketing mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing > _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
