Hey Jack, Thanks for the reply. They seem to think that , because of some consulting firms technical influence, that it would be a good idea. I discussed this with them but ...... I am doing the site survey for these folks, but have yet to 'test' 4 overlapping channels. I am curious.
Where can I get further info? Tim > Tim, > > The "large company" lacks experience with heavy-traffic networks. > A 4-channel scheme when heavily loaded will have packets bumping > into each other (self-interference). As a result, the througphut will > be reduced. > jack > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I was wondering, what would be the effect on using a 4 channel scheme > > instead of using 3 non-overlapping channels? A large company, informed > me that > > there is really no difference if there are 4 non-overlapping than 3. > Any > > comments welcome. > > > > Tim > > > > -- > > NEU : GMX Internet.FreeDSL > > Ab sofort DSL-Tarif ohne Grundgeb�hr: http://www.gmx.net/info > > -- > Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. > Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs" > http://www.ask-wi.com/book.html > True Vendor-Neutral WISP Training-Troubleshooting-Consulting > http://www.ask-wi.com/services.html > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (818) 227-4220 > > > -- NEU : GMX Internet.FreeDSL Ab sofort DSL-Tarif ohne Grundgeb�hr: http://www.gmx.net/info
