although BPL does have it's drawbacks... i'm sure that if they were to limit bpl to RURAL AREAS which don't have wireless anyway (like MINE! *cough*cough*PG&E*cough*cough*), we would avoid much of the problems.

Cities wouldn't work too well with BPL anyway... too much interference on the lines already.

There is also technology being developed that would prevent the problems of interference using sub-audible frequencies that do not affect plants, animals, humans, or anything of that sort. the kind of stuff that they use in radio stations for detecting automation codes on satellite signals, but the pitch of the two tones (binary of course) would be different than anything used in those fields.

I hope i got that info right. but don't take my word for it... i may have partially misinformed you.


Mark


On Jun 22, 2004, at 9:17 AM, Joe Robertson wrote:

For us novices out there the little film clip that showed and illustrated
the serious draw backs to BPL has left us will real concerns. Can you radio
men like Charles Pascal help us understand why the real world is not like
the story in little film clips?
I'm sure President Bush's agenda does not take this into account.
Thank you,
Joe Robertson







Reply via email to