Glad we agree on the need to be discerning regarding tweets about single studies...
Having heard no objection against this last newsletter tweet, I have now retweeted it from @wikimedia, following our general four-eyes principle (that tweet had been crafted by Dario). These may on occasion also be suitable for @wikipedia, but that would need to be looked at on a case-by-case basis. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Michael Guss <[email protected]> wrote: > No we would need to curate to determine which studies are suitable for > social promotion. > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It seems we are developing more of an interest in these recently... I >> don't think every new study is suitable to be promoted or endorsed via >> @wikipedia and other main accounts, but I'd selfishly suggest to >> retweet https://twitter.com/WikiResearch on suitable occasions. In >> particular, if there are no objections, I will start retweeting the >> new issues of the monthly newsletter more regularly from @wikimedia >> (and from @wikipedia too when fitting), starting with the new one: >> https://twitter.com/WikiResearch/status/594719120471433216 >> (we did this a couple of times before, as it's done for most other blog >> posts) >> -- >> Tilman Bayer >> Senior Analyst >> Wikimedia Foundation >> IRC (Freenode): HaeB >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > > > > -- > Michael Guss > Research Analyst > Wikimediafoundation.org > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > -- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB _______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
