Sylvain Hellegouarch;374 Wrote: > > Maybe I'm off the hook here but I think filesystems have worked that > well > *because* they are that simple. Instead of making them more complex > (WinFS > anyone?) solutions have arided by indexing them efficiently. > > Why not doing that instead? Keep your pubsub nodes simple and > straightforward but index them efficiently. > > That's the way I'd do it personally. >
Hum... in fact that's what I am proposing! :p Sorry if I am maybe unclear. My proposition is not to change the organization of nodes "filesystem-like", but to add simply possibilities of accurate subscription and search (by keywords, like tag/category, or on any parameter of an item, the author, the title, etc.). That's what you call indexing. :-) Of course at the end, one will continue to use the subnode architecture for items completely separated, but will use indexing systems for others (when one cannot clearly separate the items in distinct subnode, but still you want to give possibility to separate them with advanced methods). -- Jehan ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jehan's Profile: http://www.jabberforum.org/member.php?userid=16911 View this thread: http://www.jabberforum.org/showthread.php?t=95
