William, you did not address the opinion that Social Credit would cause
inflation and not relieve poverty.  I care more about this possible
problem than where the opinion came from.  Could Social Credit cause
inflation and not relieve poverty?  CS

On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 07:58:10 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Thanks for forwarding this, Chick.  There are several 
> things that are interesting about it.  This  
> organization is marxist-anarchist.  They would 
> eliminate government and money.  The anarchist side 
> of their beliefs actually overlaps Douglas' theory.  
> Unlike them, however, Douglas was realist enough to 
> know that you cannot eliminate government and centers 
> of power but you should strive to minimize them and 
> decentralize them with checks and balances.  Schemes 
> like a monetary authority with emphasis on the 
> authority emanate from John Hargrave, not Douglas.  
> Douglas would pay dividends directly to people.  
> Others, like Hargrave, saw nothing wrong with 
> allowing government to spend it into circulation 
> which of course gives those in control of government 
> supreme power.
> 
> Since they believe there is no need for money, they 
> obviously haven't spent very much time thinking about 
> it as is evident from the following, which is 
> primitive as compared to even Marx's analysis:
> 
> ***>In fact, there is no chronic shortage of 
> purchasing power. Sufficient [purchasing power] to 
> buy the product is generated as wages and profits in 
> the course of production; slumps are not caused by an 
> absolute shortage of purchasing power but arise when, 
> because of falling profit prospects, capitalist firms 
> choose not to spend all their profits on fully 
> renewing or on expanding production. Nor can banks 
> "create credit"; they are essentially only financial 
> intermediaries, borrowing money at one rate of 
> interest from people with cash to spare and lending 
> this at a higher rate to those needing money to spend 
> or invest, their profits coming from the difference 
> between the two interest rates. <***
> 
> Note:  Topica does not archive attachments, but does 
> [or is supposed to--Topica performance has been 
> erratic lately] forward them.  Some email software 
> sends the body of messages as attachments so will 
> archive completely blank with Topica.  Also, some 
> email software does not allow the receipt of 
> attachments, so will be received completely blank.  
> Your message came through okay to my Hotmail address 
> but is blank in the Topica archive.  I am therefore 
> appending the article below in plaintext for the 
> benefit of those who might have missed it.
> --
> 
> 
> Socialist Standard
> Journal of the Socialist Party of Great Britain
> September, 2003
> http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/sep03/
> 
> Major Douglas rides again
> 
> Adam Buick
> 
> In the course of our nearly one hundred years of 
> socialist activity, one of the ideas that we have had 
> to deal with from time to time has been currency 
> crankism � the idea that economic and social problems 
> are caused by some flaw in the monetary system and 
> that what is required to put things right is not to 
> get rid of the profit system that is capitalism but 
> mere monetary reform (of one kind or another, 
> depending on which particular school the currency 
> crank belongs to).
> 
> Between the wars the most popular school of currency 
> crankism in Britain was Social Credit, based on the 
> ideas of Major Douglas (as he was known). His 
> explanation for the slump � of poverty amidst 
> potential plenty, of unmet needs alongside idle 
> factories and widespread unemployment, of piles of 
> unsold goods being destroyed � was simple, not to say 
> simplistic: it was due to a lack of purchasing power, 
> to people not having enough money to buy what they 
> needed or to constitute a market worth catering for. 
> The solution, too, was simplistic: distribute 
> purchasing power free to people in the form of a 
> "social dividend" paid by the government.
> 
> Douglas believed that banks could "create credit" by 
> the mere stroke of a pen, but that they deliberately 
> kept money scarce so as to be able to charge a higher 
> rate of interest. Hence his solution that the banks 
> should be taken over by the government and their 
> supposed power to create credit exercised but in the 
> general interest, as "social credit".
> 
> In fact, there is no chronic shortage of purchasing 
> power. Sufficient [purchasing power] to buy the 
> product is generated as wages and profits in the 
> course of production; slumps are not caused by an 
> absolute shortage of purchasing power but arise when, 
> because of falling profit prospects, capitalist firms 
> choose not to spend all their profits on fully 
> renewing or on expanding production. Nor can banks 
> "create credit"; they are essentially only financial 
> intermediaries, borrowing money at one rate of 
> interest from people with cash to spare and lending 
> this at a higher rate to those needing money to spend 
> or invest, their profits coming from the difference 
> between the two interest rates.
> 
> This being the case, the main result of applying 
> "social credit" would be roaring inflation. All the 
> other problems of capitalism, including periodically 
> re-occurring "poverty amidst plenty", would continue 
> unabated. They will only end when the means of 
> production are brought into common ownership and 
> democratic control so that they can be oriented 
> towards directly satisfying people's needs � when 
> banks, money and all the rest of the buying and 
> selling system will have become redundant.
> 
> Normally, lack-of-purchasing power currency crank 
> theories flourish in times of slump. However, 
> according to an article by Derek Wall, "Social 
> Credit: The Ecosocialism of Fools", in the June issue 
> of Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, the modern-day 
> followers of Major Douglas are well ensconced in the 
> Green Party:
> 
> "Brian Leslie, whose parents were members of the 
> Social Credit Greenshirts during the 1930s, chairs 
> the Green Party Economics Working Group. The 
> newsletter, Sustainable Economics, is almost entirely 
> concerned with social credit and Party economics 
> speaker Molly Scott Cato advocates monetary reform . 
> . . Frances Hutchinson, a former member of the Green 
> Party left grouping, the Association of Socialist 
> Greens, has revived the Douglas Social Credit 
> Secretariat . . . Wilfred Price, a member of the 
> Greenshirts in the 1930s, joined the Ecology Party 
> (now the Green Party) in the early 1980s and 
> powerfully spoke for social credit as a form of green 
> politics."
> 
> Currency cranks find it easy to infiltrate the Green 
> Party because of the tendency amongst its members and 
> supporters to blame "big banks" and international 
> financial institutions for ecological problems and 
> the ravages of capitalist globalisation. The Green 
> Party has, for instance, lined up alongside the 
> Tories, the UKIP and other reactionaries in the 
> "defend the pound" camp because it sees the euro as 
> an international (in the sense of anti-national) 
> currency.
> 
> Derek Wall's article concentrates on the political 
> side of Social Credit rather than on its economic 
> fallacies (though he recognises these), in particular 
> on the anti-semitic position it took up between the 
> wars. The title of his article is taken from August 
> Bebel, a pre-WWI German Social Democrat, who once 
> quipped that "anti-semitism is the socialism of the 
> fool", by which he meant the anti-capitalism of the 
> fool. And it is, of course, a short step between 
> denouncing "global finance" for causing problems to 
> blaming "international Jewish bankers" or some other 
> supposed international conspiracy or cabal. It was a 
> step that Douglas himself took. Wall quotes him as 
> writing in Social Credit (1933):
> 
> "In a remarkable document which received some 
> publicity some years ago, under the title of 'The 
> Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion', a 
> Machiavellian scheme for the enslavement of the world 
> was outlined. The authenticity of this document is a 
> matter of little importance; what is interesting 
> about it, is the fidelity with which the methods by 
> which such enslavement might be brought about can be 
> seen reflected in the facts of everyday experience."
> 
> Wall � a Green Party member who describes himself as 
> an "eco-Marxist" � recognises that Social Credit 
> doesn't have to be anti-semitic and that its 
> supporters in the Green movement (with one exception) 
> are not. His concern is to warn the Green Party and 
> the anti-globalisation movement against embracing 
> monetary reform as a quick-fix solution but also of 
> the dangerous company they risk falling into if they 
> continue down the road of blaming "global finance" 
> for ruining "national" � and local � economies.
> --
> 
> 
> 
> ----original message----
> Date:   Mon, 08 Sep 2003 07:15:43 -0600 
> From:   Chick Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:   [SOCIAL CREDIT] Wants Critical Comment 
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Reply To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> This message was sent to the Alberta Social Credit 
> Party by someone who wants a response from the Social 
> Credit perspective.  I thought it might be 
> interesting to see what the list might have to say 
> about it.
> 
> Chick
> 
> -----
> From: Robert Stafford 
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:57 AM
> Subject: Critical comment
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Having recently visited your website, I am sure you 
> will be interested to read a critical examination of 
> social credit.   The essay in question, Major Douglas 
> rides again, appears below and is taken from the 
> September 2003 Socialist Standard.
> 
> Needless to say, any feedback would be much 
> appreciated.
> 
> Yours for a world without money,
> 
> R
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos 
> Mail!
> http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
> 
> 
> 
> 

--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
--^----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to