Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:10:41PM +0200, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
>> This is an effort to provide a CAN transceiver subsystem for use with
>> socketcan.
>> The goal is to allow different functions of different CAN transceivers
>> to nicely cooperate with socketCAN devices, without socketCAN devices
>> needing to know thing of their corresponding transceivers.
>
> a short extract of my usage of a pca82c251. I could not find a spot to
> insert it as example.
> It comes from a board with 2 sja1000's, connected as platform_device.
> The board has 2 gpio's, one for each transceiver to enable.
>
> static struct pca82c251_platform_data cantr_pdata[2] = {
> [0] = {
> .gpio = 97,
> .slope_resistor = 47000,
> .match = "sja1000_platform.0",
> },
> [1] = {
> .gpio = 98,
> .slope_resistor = 47000,
> .match = "sja1000_platform.1",
> },
> };
>
> static struct platform_device cantr[2] = {
> [0] = {
> .name = "pca82c251",
> .id = 0,
> .dev.platform_data = &cantr_pdata[0],
> },
> [1] = {
> .name = "pca82c251",
> .id = 1,
> .dev.platform_data = &cantr_pdata[1],
> },
> };
>
>
> Maybe it's a help
> Kurt
Hi Kurt,
thanks for your proposal.
I'm currently on holiday and i'm back on work end of next week.
Maybe i can play with it on my mpc5200 platform then where a SJA1041 and
SJA1054 are attached ...
Thanks,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
