Hi Oliver,

Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> 
>>>>> i updated the SVN and introduced a new GET_CAN_DLC() macro, that casts the
>>>>> data length code information to __u8 and ensures the dlc not to be > 8 .
>>>> I like your approach. I'm just not happy with the name. We should use
>>>> the prefix "can_" for public functions and lower-case seems also more
>>>> appropriate. A "static inline" is less handy, I agree. Therefore I vote
>>>> for "can_get_dlc()". Also some description for that macro would be nice.
>>> No problem.
>>>
>>> So you would suggest to s/GET_CAN_DLC/can_get_dlc/g to rename the macro, 
>>> right?
>> Well, yes, also "get_can_dlc" would be fine as we already have
>> alloc_candev, etc.
> 
> Done.
> 
> Indeed the documentation was missing ;-)

Are you going to prepare a patch for mainline as well?

Thanks,

Wolfgang.
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core

Reply via email to