Hi Wolfgang, I tested top of SVN with our device without any problems. Fine!
I promise to use checkpatch more regularly. I promise to use checkpatch more regularly. I promise to use checkpatch more regularly. On Friday 15 January 2010 10:41, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > Hi Wolfgang, > > > > On Thursday 14 January 2010 20:48, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > [snip] > >> Puh, to avoid another round, I fixed the issues above and another one > >> reported by checkpatch and commited the patch with your signed-of-by > >> line. Please check. > > Thanks. I will checkout and test it. > >> Thanks for your contribution. > > Thanks for review and comments. > > > > BTW, how do we keep SVN and kernel/linux-2.6-net more or less in sync? > > By backporting patches from the kernel to SVN trunk... or the other way > round. > > > Should I post a proper patch to the netdev list? > > Yes, if you want to get your patch included into the mainline kernel, > you should send a proper patch to the netdev ml with a cc to the > socketcan ml. For that driver, it makes sense to include the Linux USB > ml as well. The patch should be against David Miller's "net-next-2.6" > tree. As this question is asked frequently, I' going to compose a little > document "submitting-socketcan-patches" on that topic. > Ok, I will prepare that patch in a couple of days. Matthias _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
