Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> I have the feeling that the MPC2515 is easier physically to be interfaced, >> but the SJA1000 driver is more mature in the socketcan project and due the >> interface is parallel could have a better performance. Also, would be easier >> to debug because, less software layers (no spidev driver). >> > > Performance might be a problem, especially if it should operate at > 1MB/s. Some users reported packet losses with the MPC251x due to little > buffering in the hardware and slower device access via SPI and work queue. > >
I can back this up. We have decided not to use mcp2515 because of packet loss on our board. /Brian _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
