Hi Yegor, On 01/12/2011 11:12 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > >>> Since slcan is supported by the mainline kernel, what about creating an >>> extra project can-utils, introduce version number and start include it in >>> various distributions? >>> >>> I've seen packages for Suse >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=i686-can-utils&project=home%3Aolh%3Across, >>> but what about other distributions? >> Good idea! Due to a lack of resources, the following items on the TODO >> list did not really progress: >> >> - Unified and consolidated can-utils > > Do you mean the one from official socketcan repo and one from Pengutronix?
Yes. For distributions we need a small set of cleaned up can-utils. Unfortunately, there are some >> - libsocketcan > > Should this be a separate project/package? As it's just one file, I also tend to combine it with a minimal set of can-utils into socketcan-utils. Anyway, in the end it's just a matter of packaging. After some discussion on this list we should be able to agree on a common proposal on how to provide a new socketcan-util/lib package. The real implementation should then not be a really big deal. >> - Home page and Wiki > > Where should it reside? As long as we do not move away from BerliOS, the Wiki of http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan/ should be used. Yesterday I started to convert our can.txt to get started. Oliver, did you already start a similar effort? Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
