On 01/12/2011 04:19 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > On 12.01.2011 15:39, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Hi Yegor, >> >> On 01/12/2011 11:12 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote: >>> Hi Wolfgang, >>> >>>>> Since slcan is supported by the mainline kernel, what about creating an >>>>> extra project can-utils, introduce version number and start include it in >>>>> various distributions? >>>>> >>>>> I've seen packages for Suse >>>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=i686-can-utils&project=home%3Aolh%3Across, >>>>> but what about other distributions? > > Btw. i've seen some debian package for the SocketCAN utils (on debian.org??) - > but i don't know it's current state. > >>>> Good idea! Due to a lack of resources, the following items on the TODO >>>> list did not really progress: >>>> >>>> - Unified and consolidated can-utils >>> >>> Do you mean the one from official socketcan repo and one from Pengutronix? >> >> Yes. For distributions we need a small set of cleaned up can-utils. >> Unfortunately, there are some > > Yes, we should check, which of the tool are really relevant to 'common users'. > > >>>> - Home page and Wiki >>> >>> Where should it reside? >> >> As long as we do not move away from BerliOS, the Wiki of >> >> http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan/ >> >> should be used. Yesterday I started to convert our can.txt to get >> started. Oliver, did you already start a similar effort? > > What can.txt?
The one from net-next-2.6. > > The can.txt in socketcan/trunk/kernel/2.6/Documentation/networking/ has been > already splitted up into small chunks by Daniele Venzano. > > Did you try 'svn up' ?? :-) No, because it needs to be converted to Wiki markup language anyway :-(. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
