I've a Net4801 w/ FreeBSD 6.2 running pf w/ altq & carp, spamd, rbldnsd & bind9.

Performing nicely, so far.

I'm interested in adding active IDS to the mix, along the lines of
Snort + SnortSam, hoping to integrate with pf etc.

What's been the experience on list with Snort's performance on this
sort of setup?  Snort *can* be a bit of a resource 'pig' (couldn't
resist ...)

There are lightweight -- and light in function -- alternatives, e.g.,

http://danger.rulez.sk/projects/bruteforceblocker/
http://pfsense.best-view.net/packages/config/pfPorts/sshlockout_pf/files/sshlockout_pf.c

that seem to be ssh-port-specific, but could be readily adapted.

Just wondering whether Snort is too heavy, or whether I should adopt a
lightweight, perlcc-compiled (e.g.) alternative ...

Yes, I know it's subjective ... hence looking for some subjective opinions.

Thanks.

--Tenzen
_______________________________________________
Soekris-tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech

Reply via email to