Bill Maas writes:
> It depends on the application you have in mind. For a router, the CF
> is perfect, for a DB backend server it most likely
> isn't. Maintaining a swap partition is also not a viable option with
> a CF card.
This isn't actually true. Even the older CF cards have "good enough"
wear levelling. I've got a mail server that's nearly 4 years old. It
runs off of CF. It hasn't missed a beat. By the time it dies I'll
probably be able to buy a new CF card with 100x the capacity, a better
wear-levelling algorith, more bandwidth and it will cost peanuts.
Why do people still believe this FUD?
Regards,
Richard....
_______________________________________________
Soekris-tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
