Hi all, After creating a NTA agent with a thread-safe home, is it ok to assume that any other thread can call nta_leg_destroy() without any synchronism problem?
What if nta_leg_destroy() is called from a given thread, and meanwhile the "main" thread is receiving a new transaction to that same leg? Also, what if a new leg is created in the NTA (so added to the internal list of legs) and meanwhile another thread calls nta_leg_destroy() (so removed from the internal list of legs). Are those operations on the internal list (or hash table, or whatever it is) synchronized in a multi-threaded environment with a thread-safe home in the NTA? In a brief, is making the home of NTA agent thread-safe enough for all those situations? Thanks in advance, -Aleksander ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
