2009/2/27 Aleksander Morgado <sofia-sip-de...@aleksander.es>: > In my case, no such reply/report is needed, as I just need to dispatch the > su_msg_r and nothing else, so I was wondering if this other approach is > acceptable:
> * Instead of `su_msg_create()', use `su_msg_new()' > * Then, instead of `su_msg_send()', use `su_msg_send_to()', as this last > function only needs the receiver's su_task_r. > > Is this a correct approach? Yes, su_msg_new()/su_msg_send_to() is way to go. It would probably be better always to use su_msg_new()/su_msg_send_to(). -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
