>
> > In my case, no such reply/report is needed, as I just need to dispatch
> the
> > su_msg_r and nothing else, so I was wondering if this other approach is
> > acceptable:
>
> > * Instead of `su_msg_create()', use `su_msg_new()'
> > * Then, instead of `su_msg_send()', use `su_msg_send_to()', as this last
> > function only needs the receiver's su_task_r.
> >
> > Is this a correct approach?
>
> Yes, su_msg_new()/su_msg_send_to() is way to go. It would probably be
> better always to use su_msg_new()/su_msg_send_to().
>
Nice, thanks!
-Aleksander
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Sofia-sip-devel mailing list
Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
