There can download e-books and eda freely



Plz read the access rules careful



http://www.rdfwt.com/forumdisplay.php?f=74



-------Original Message-------



From: Wolfgang Hartmann

Date: 04/10/06 06:23:18

To: [email protected]

Subject: [soft_radio] Re: phase noise and spectrum
analyzers, plls (3)



Hallo Cecil,



I wrote originally some notes about pll's because I
was asked to do

So. It is a very simple and maybe basic type of
information, I gave.



Now, I would like to hear from You the "other side of
the world",

Which advantages are to await from a digitial system?



Would You like to send some lines about the essential
parts and give

An explanation about the main topics?



Wolfgang





--- In [email protected], KD5NWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>

> You are thinking in terms of analog mixers, Digital
QSD mixers are a

> whole other world. QSD mixers have to have a square
wave clock, and

> function way better than a analog mixer if given a
low phase noise

> "digital" clock. If they are given an analog sine
wave for a clock,

> you would have to turn that back into a digital
signal which can

> introduce jitter, so when possible it's best to keep
the clock

> digital as much as possible. In a well designed QSD
system a clock

> divider will improve the phase noise figures not
make it worse.

>

>

> Food for thought.

>

>

> At 04:03 PM 4/8/2006, you wrote:

> >An addendum to my info:

> >

> > From this paper, I gave You the Internet-address,
You can clearly see

> >and take some consequences for receiver
constructing.

> >

> >1.1. If one has an oscillator with phase-noise, You
not only mix the

> >oscillator not only with the incoming frequency,
but also with the

> >phase-noise of the oscilltor. It is something like
a synchronous

> >mixing with a lot of frequencies and a lot of
mixing products. The

> >less the bandwidth of the phase-noise the better
for quality of mixing

> >result.

> >

> >1.2. At mixing You mix a strong signal (the
oscillator-signal) with a

> >very little one, the incoming signal. Partly You
have to filter the

> >product.

> >

> >1.3. You should avoid all solutions with phase
noise inclusive

> >solutions with IC-dividers.

> >

> >1.4. The better the signal of the mixing process,
the better the

> >result. Because of that, to gain ultimate quality,
You should forget a

> >lot of solutions and change to a DDS-circuit with a
very high

> >working-frequency. All other solutions have a lack
of quality, to

> >reach ultimate success.

> >

> >1.5. The alternative could be a quartz-osciallator,
but one is not

> >able to change the frequency in a wider range.

> >

> >1.6. My "feeling is" even concepts with
I,Q-solutions could be better,

> >if a fast DDS-circuit is used.

> >

> >1.7. Having a rectangular signal meens a lot of
filtering.... And a

> >lot of useless noise.

> >

> >One can see, that using a fast DDS-circuit is at
the moment even for

> >traditional receveiver concepts in let me say AM,
SSB and other

> >modulation-types is "state of the art" and You
miss-use time and

> >effort for other versions.

> >

> >I will look for answers coming. In the meantime, I
will work with

My DRT1.

> >

> >An incoming signal is always not a digital one
even, if its

> >constructed digital by modulation as DRM.

> >

> >Wolfgang

> >

> >--- In [email protected], "Wolfgang
Hartmann"

> ><dadalbinder@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Hallo to all, especially to Dan.

> > >

> > > Here is an email address, wher You can find some
informations in

German

> > > language.

> > >

> > > http://www.elexs.de/clock3.htm

> > >

> > > You see the phase-noise and the noise carpet of
several designs.

> > >

> > > They have a lot more on DRM, Elektor-receiver.

> > >

> > > Wolfgang

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >Yahoo! Groups Links

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

> Cecil Bayona

> KD5NWA

> www.qrpradio.com

>

> "Windows the worlds most successful software virus"

>





















YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



Visit your group "soft_radio" on the web.



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.













__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com




SPONSORED LINKS
Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to