--- In [email protected], "Andre Belokon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Alberto,
>
> Thanks, I understand this. But I think that simple rewrite version of
> SetHWLO will be more acceptable for such situation:
> long SetHWLO(long LOfreq)
> i.e. SetHWLO try to set new frequency (or nearest which hw support)
> and return real freq of LO.
>
> Regards, Andre
Hi Andre,
that is a sensible suggestion. Presently the return value from the
SetHWLO API is used for a different purpose, but when modifying the
DLL specs for the Tx part I will take into consideration your
proposal. Thanks.
73 Alberto I2PHD
