Hi I would try late at night on the lower two frequencies.
Bob On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:40 PM, hank smith wrote: > > what freq should I try living in tucson az? > thanks fore the help > <smiles> > Hank > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bob Camp > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 7:35 PM > Subject: Re: [soft_radio] going to test my sdr with shortwave time clock need > some help > > Hi > > Canada's time signal is CHU > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHU_(radio_station) > > They are on 3.33 7.85 and 14.67 MHz. Good for time, traditionally not so good > for frequency. That may have changed recently. > > Bob > > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:04 PM, hank smith wrote: > >> >> >> what is the one from canada on? >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Alberto I2PHD >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 7:38 AM >> Subject: Re: [soft_radio] going to test my sdr with shortwave time clock >> need some help >> >> On 2/3/2010 1:03 AM, Bob Camp wrote: >>> >>> Assuming you are in the US, the stations the most useful stations will be >>> 5, 10, and 15 MHz from WWV. >>> They also transmit on 2.5 and 20 MHz. They transmit AM voice along with >>> various beeps and stuff. >>> >> And if you are in Europe you could take advantage from the Russian stations >> RWN, located at 4,996 kHz, 9,996 kHz and 14,996 kHz. >> They alternate periods with one-second clicks with periods of silence, with >> periods with 1/10th of a second clicks. >> And depending on the hour and the propagation maybe you are able to receive >> one or another or all three of them. >> They have the customary Caesium precision, accuracy and stability. >> >> 73 Alberto I2PHD >> >> > > >
