yes, i see the post you are referring to... "Makes total sense...It would be nice, however, to be able to save out to an older version from the newer version...not nice enough to prevent awesome new updates, but nice enough if it were a relatively trivial task."
i guess it doesn't matter what luc-eric says now :P s On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Eric Turman <[email protected]> wrote: > But I was originally suggesting the prior...the one that Luc-Eric said > that "the team could conceivably consider." > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Steven Caron <[email protected]> wrote: > >> nope, mixed up again... 2013 could in theory save a file knowing which >> features 2012 doesn't support, but 2012 would need to radically change how >> it loaded data from future (forward) versions and features it does not yet >> know about. brent was talking about the latter. >> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Eric Turman <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Wait...I thought that Brent said that it was not trivial to implement a >>> 'save as previous version'; It sounded like it would take considerable >>> resources to implement that. >>> >>> > > > -- > > > > > -=T=- >
