You are probably correct. On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Steven Caron <[email protected]> wrote:
> yes, i see the post you are referring to... > > "Makes total sense...It would be nice, however, to be able to save out to > an older version from the newer version...not nice enough to prevent > awesome new updates, but nice enough if it were a relatively trivial task. > " > > i guess it doesn't matter what luc-eric says now :P > > s > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Eric Turman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But I was originally suggesting the prior...the one that Luc-Eric said >> that "the team could conceivably consider." >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Steven Caron <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> nope, mixed up again... 2013 could in theory save a file knowing which >>> features 2012 doesn't support, but 2012 would need to radically change how >>> it loaded data from future (forward) versions and features it does not yet >>> know about. brent was talking about the latter. >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Eric Turman <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Wait...I thought that Brent said that it was not trivial to implement a >>>> 'save as previous version'; It sounded like it would take considerable >>>> resources to implement that. >>>> >>>> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> -=T=- >> > > -- -=T=-
