So glad I asked.  Hahaha.  I knew your thorough personality yields the best
answers.  Thanks much!

-Lu

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Matt Lind <[email protected]>wrote:

> Anybody using Softimage in our building only use Nvidia GeForce.  We have
> many models and found some better than others.  The 200 series is very
> stable, the 400 series should be avoided at all costs, the 500 series is a
> mixed bag (560 good, 580 tempermental).  We just got a few computers with
> the 670 and breaking them in as we speak.  I’m the only person in the
> company using a Quadro as I have to determine if bugs experienced in
> production are due to hardware or software before filing a bug report.****
>
> ** **
>
> On the few occasions we experience problems, it’s usually an OpenGL crash
> to blue screen or overheating – both are driver issues.  We also discovered
> mixing and matching consumer and professional components in the same box is
> a bad idea.  Either buy a consumer level computer with a consumer level
> graphics card, or buy a professional workstation with a professional
> graphics card.  When you mix and match you run into driver related issues
> as the consumer lines like GeForce don’t go through the same level of QA
> and certification as the Quadro line – GeForces seem to be tested on a much
> narrower band of hardware configurations.  Although Nvidia releases driver
> updates more frequently for the GeForce product line, you’ll be waiting
> much longer for patches to fix things in Softimage than with the Quadro
> line.  About 6 months in my unscientific observations.****
>
> ** **
>
> As much as people complain here about Quadros being crappy, crash prone,
> and over priced, I will say I have significantly fewer problems than my
> colleagues here at the studio.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Matt****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Meng-Yang Lu
> *Sent:* Monday, August 20, 2012 11:37 AM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Graphic card for a workstation again****
>
> ** **
>
> Can you say which cards you guys are using, Matt?  In the process of
> building a system to do some GPU stuff alongside some 3D tests at home.  *
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> ** **
>
> -Lu****
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Matt Lind <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> We are a games development studio making MMORPG games.  Most of the
> computers we buy come stocked with ATI Radeons, but no matter how much we
> try to make them work, they just don’t.  Crashes, glitches, overheating,
> etc…   We always have to swap them out for Nvidia GeForce cards to get
> stability.****
>
>  ****
>
> Framerate isn’t everything, stability often matters more.****
>
>  ****
>
> Matt****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mirko Jankovic
> *Sent:* Friday, August 17, 2012 10:30 PM****
>
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Graphic card for a workstation again****
>
>  ****
>
> Maybe it is so but it still doesn't change the fact that after replacing
> gtx580 with radeon7970 I got HUGE improvement in frame rates in viewport
> and no problems at all as well :)****
>
> It seems that all new gtx cards after 280 are crippled in an effort to
> push overpriced quadros. ****
>
> But ofc we need to make differences between big studios on one side
> (usually  huge budgets :)) and small to mid studios and freelancers.****
>
> ** **
>

Reply via email to